Monday, November 20, 2017

Justice League: Did It Suck?


Justice League is the latest film in the DCEU universe. If you have been keeping score DC's movie universe has been 2 for 1 as BvS kinda sucked and Suicide Squad was a bit of a mess. The only film that showed a glimmer of hope was Wonder Woman. This time around you have a few more heroes joining Batman and Wonder Woman are a few more heroes from DC to save the world and honestly save the entire DCEU. Will they do it or will this another point in the list of "you're doing movies wrong DC"? Oh, and Zack Snyder made this so, fun times?

So let 's get to the plot. There might be spoilers.

     It's up to Batman and Wonder Woman to recruit and form a league of heroes to stop an upcoming force that could doom us all. The main villain, Steppenwolf, a super evil badass warrior who everyone from Earth, Aquarians, Amazons, and just regular men had to stop uniting three companion cubes, oops I'm sorry, Mother Boxes is back to finish the job and prepare for the coming of Darkseid by using the three sequels worth of AllSparks from the Transformer movies, I mean Mother Boxes, to change the climate of Earth. Basically like what General Zod tried to do in Man of Steel, except more of a hellish apocalyptic wasteland. Sounds epic? Not really.
     The whole movie was lull. Very vanilla in a sea of bland snow. You had a build up, not much character buildup or honestly really good movie pacing, but an ok introduction to all of the heores and everyone getting together to prevent Steppenwolf from his plan and not having a proper trade off at the climax in the movie. The actual final showdown was anti epic and climatic in the most possible way. Again, you had all this build up to the final battle with Steppenwolf being all evil intergalactic badass that EVERYONE on Earth had to stop him from turning the planet to a wasteland the first time to being defeated by his own fear after being knocked around by Superman and Wonder Woman. It also hurts as the battles with Steppenwolf were more epic, especially that Amazon fight scene (God I miss watching Wonder Woman after this). As the polar opposite of how anticlimactic things got you're met with a pretty HUGE WTF.
     It wasn't all bad. You did get a bit of lightheartedness in a response to DC's plan to make everything all Dark and Gritty™. You did get a generous bit of comedy which was cute. The MVPs of the movie have to be Ezra Miller, Ray Fisher, and Jason Momoa. Ezra had great comedic timing. Even though he was the comedic relief of the movie it wasn't annoying in any sense, which can happen alot in these movies. Ray Fisher's cyborg was the character the film decide to give a lot character growth which Fisher handled it well, compared to everyone else. Jason Momoa is basically Atlantis' answer to Wolverine and there's nothing wrong with that. For everyone else everyone did play their parts well. Warning if you loved Wonder Woman Diana, she's not here but who figured her to be. This is years later while she's used to being in man's world and Steve is dead. She can be a bit broody instead of Amazon Ariel in her solo movie. The Superman part was pretty good.

Final Verdict
     Honestly I feel like Justice League honestly doesn't know what movie it wanted to be. It tried to be comedic like Suicide Squad but didn't go all out like Suicide Squad did. It tried to be uplifting at times like Man of Steel and in some cases Wonder Woman but it just feels like lip service and half assed. Meanwhile Justice League trying to be everything it winds up not being much and boring. It doesn't help that it faced the same issues that Batman v Superman met with connecting everything. Batman v Superman gave you a lot of stuff going on as well as the main story. Justice League meanwhile didn't have much only having one big plot and still had trouble linking everything together or making things flow effortlessly. I like many people who saw Wonder Woman wanted to see DC and Warner Bros steer this universe into the right direction and had hope that after Wonder Woman that this would be the case. Like Tyra Banks we were rooting for you, Justice League, how dare you! Learn something from this DC. Hopefully letting Zack Snyder stick with Superman movies since that is the only part he got right, pretty much. Justice League gets 2 SuperFriends out of 5.

Sunday, November 12, 2017

Is Super Mario Odyssey the Best Mario Game Ever?


     Super Mario Odyssey is out and holy goomba on a stick is it is awesome. This time Mario has to step out of the Mushroom Kingdom and brave a whole new world as he sets sail to rescue Princess Peach, again. It's no doubt that Odyssey is a great game with a ton of creativity in the many worlds Mario has to look for Power Moons in, new mechanics that spices up old traditional 3D Mario gameplay, and tons of stuff to explore in the many kingdoms, including secrets and easter eggs. With a ton of stuff to do and how great Odyssey looks and plays, you have to wonder is it the best Mario game ever?

     It is no doubt that Odyssey is modeled after past 3D Mario titles. Odyssey is the first open world Mario Game since Super Mario Sunshine and Super Mario 64. The first Mario 3D title, Super Mario 64 is set the standard for ever 3D Mario game as its influence is not only calling back to the Mushroom Kingdom but to its exploration and gameplay as Mario is in these huge worlds looking for Power Moons which are the stars in the game, literally in the Mushroom Kingdom. While Mario 64 is the blueprint, Super Mario Sunshine is the biggest contributor to Odyssey's development.
       The goal in Odyssey's development seems to be to take things that were in both 64 and Sunshine and take it to newer heights like a P-Wing. Like Sunshine you do get traditional gameplay mixed in with a ton of puzzles elements, but Odessey takes thing and flip it on its head. The puzzles and puzzlier and funnier. What's also is on its head is Cappy which seems to be a huge step up than what FLUDD was in Sunshine. With Cappy, Mario is able to do all sorts of things from attacking enemies, using him to jump further, and possess enemies.

     If possessing enemies isn't enough then there are a ton of easter eggs and secrets in the game. Easter eggs and references isn't anything new to Mario games, especially the recent ones. Odyssey is however chock full of throwbacks to send you into a nostalgia coma for months. From almost everything in the Mushroom Kingdom (including Yoshi's house from Super Mario World) to Metro Kingdom referencing Mario's Jumpman days in Donkey Kong.
    Odyssey has up the ante in term of content and gameplay than its predecessors but is it a much better game than both? It's hard to make a definitive judgement as each Mario game have its charm. Odyssey is technically the better game, but it doesn't have the feel to it 64 exploring the castle grounds and the character that Sunshine had venturing Isle Defino. It is good that Odyssey does take things up a notch compared to 64 and Sunshine and it's great that it does those things without ruining classing 3D Mario gameplay.

What are your thoughts?